| By Victor Rasputnis, Anatole Tartakovsky, Igor Nys | Article Rating: |
|
| November 25, 2005 01:00 PM EST | Reads: |
78,691 |
Custom Tag Definition
Structurally, a custom tag is a file with an HTC extension that describes its properties, methods, and events between <PUBLIC:COMPONENT> and </PUBLIC:COMPONENT>.
To define a custom CHECKBOX tag, we create a file checkbox.htc as in the following snippet where the first line sets the tag name of the component:
<PUBLIC:COMPONENT NAME="cbx" tagName="CHECKBOX">
<PROPERTY NAME="value" GET="getValue" PUT="putValue" />
// Here we place all other properties of the component
<METHOD NAME="show" />
// Here we place all other methods of the components
<EVENT NAME="onItemChanging" ID="onItemChanging"/>
// Here we place all other events that component will fire to application
<ATTACH EVENT="oncontentready" HANDLER="constructor" />
// Here we place all other events that component handles itself
<SCRIPT >
// Here we place all methods, properties getters and setters and event handlers
</SCRIPT>
</PUBLIC:COMPONENT>
Custom Tag Use Case
While the contents of the HTC file matter a lot, the name of the file is irrelevant, although, ultimately, the URL to the HTC file needs to be specified using the IMPORT instruction. It has to be done before the corresponding custom tag is mentioned for the first time (on the page). Here is how the simplest possible page utilizing a custom checkbox might look, assuming the page and the HTC file are located in one folder:
<HTML xmlns:myns>
<?IMPORT namespace="myns" implementation="checkbox.htc" >
<BODY>
<myns:checkbox id='cbx_1' label='Hello'/>
</BODY>
</HTML>
Please notice how custom CHECKBOX has been mapped to a nondefault namespace "myns" in the opening HTML tag. The IMPORT instruction performs a synchronous load of the HTC into the browser's memory and also instructs the browser how to perform name resolution for the appropriate namespace (HTC to namespace association can be many-to-one).
Constructor of the Custom Tag
The best way to initialize HTC, once it's loaded, is to process the "oncontentready" event. Accordingly, we define a handler function, which for sheer clarity is called constructor:
<ATTACH EVENT="oncontentready" HANDLER="constructor" />
The logic of constructor() is simple: concatenate a regular HTML checkbox and HTML label in the order dependent on the value of property labelonleft (see property definition below):
function constructor() {
// We will add an HTML checkbox and label to the element body
// See Listing 2 for details
}
Defining Custom Tag Properties
To define property labelonleft, we add one more line to the <PUBLIC:COMPONENT> section:
<PROPERTY NAME="labelonleft" VALUE="true"/>
Please note that this property does not contain getter and/or setter methods. Properties onValue and offValue that provide the mapping of the checkbox status into a business value domain also don't need getters and setters:
<PROPERTY NAME="onValue" VALUE="true"/>
<PROPERTY NAME="offValue" VALUE="false" />
However, property checked is defined with both getter and setter:
<PROPERTY NAME="checked" GET="getChecked" PUT="putChecked" />
Accordingly, we have definitions for both methods in the <SCRIPT> section. As you can see, setter putChecked(), which is triggered every time checked is modified, sets the value property to one of two variants: onValue or OffValue. Please note that putChecked() will get triggered not only by the script on the checkbox-hosting page, but also by any assignment to checked done inside this very checkbox.htc.
var _value;
function putChecked( newValue ) {
value = (newValue?onValue:offValue);
}
function getChecked(){
return ( _value == onValue);
}
Defining Events for the Custom Tag
Let's look at the definition of onItemChanging and onItemChanged events and how these events are being fired and processed inside the setter for value property (see Listing 2).
Method putValue() has a couple of points of interest. First, it can be called during the parsing on the CHECKBOX tag, as long as the HTML value attribute is specified. That's why we have a separate logic branch for not constructed objects, to differentiate the process of construction from a reaction to a user click. Second, we illustrate here the creation and processing of the custom event onItemChanging, which allows the application to cancel (block) the action. Please note that both clicking as well as programmatic assignment to the value can get cancelled this way.
Event Canceling
To cancel the event, an application should intercept the event and set event.returnValue to false. The schematic snippet of code illustrating how the application would cancel the processing is presented below:
cbx_1::onItemChanging() {
. . . . .
if (canNotBeAllowed) {
event.returnValue=false;
. . . . .
}
If the event is not cancelled, putValue() sets the internal, plain HTML checkbox's checked property as per the current value: if that is equal to onValue, the internal checkbox will get checked; if it is equal to offValue (there is no third option), unchecked (the full listing is presented in Listing 2).
HTML Internals of the CHECKBOX
The painting of our control is done by the helper functions addLabel() and addCheckBox() and is called from within a constructor(). These functions inject HTML inside the element's innerHTML (element is the analog for this in HTC parlor). The injected HTML, in the simplified form, looks like the following:
<LABEL for=cb_{uniqueID}>Show Details:</LABEL>
<INPUT id=cb_{uniqueID} type=checkbox />
where uniqueID is a unique (within a page) string literal generated by IE, which identifies the instance of the HTC.
Published November 25, 2005 Reads 78,691
Copyright © 2005 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Victor Rasputnis
Dr. Victor Rasputnis is a Managing Principal of Farata Systems. He's responsible for providing architectural design, implementation management and mentoring to companies migrating to XML Internet technologies. He holds a PhD in computer science from the Moscow Institute of Robotics. You can reach him at vrasputnis@faratasystems.com
More Stories By Anatole Tartakovsky
Anatole Tartakovsky is a Managing Principal of Farata Systems. He's responsible for creation of frameworks and reusable components. Anatole authored number of books and articles on AJAX, XML, Internet and client-server technologies. He holds an MS in mathematics. You can reach him at atartakovsky@faratasystems.com
More Stories By Igor Nys
Igor Nys is a Director of Technology Solutions at EPAM Systems, Inc, a company combining IT consulting expertise with advanced onshore-offshore software development practices. Igor has been working on many different computer platforms and languages including Java, C++, PowerBuilder, Lisp, Assembler since the mid 80's. Igor is currently managing a number of large distributed projects between US and Europe. In addition Igor is the author of the award-winning freeware system-management tools, and he was closely involved in the development of XMLSP technology - one of the AJAX pioneers.
![]() |
David 11/29/05 01:24:43 PM EST | |||
This looks like the true bleeding edge, once again creating more headaches in the write many, test many world that web services were supposed to have resolved. What good is AJAX of this sort when there are differences between just two browsers? Do we really need more technology that is non-standard to the point where we'll need lots of adaptations just to handle the various types of browsers people will use? No doubt this will also mean variations will be needed even among differing versions of the same browser class. Without a standard set of markup and scripting elements, AJAX is just going to make more bad web sites that work with only one browser but fail with others. |
||||
![]() |
Edwin 11/25/05 03:06:50 PM EST | |||
Software AG sells the Ajax based RIA developement environment CAI COmposite Application Integrator. This product is on the market for several years now. So saying there are no RAD Ajax tools available... |
||||
- 4th International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo Starts Today
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- Performance Tuning Essentials for Java
- Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Google Wave
- IBM Hardware Chief, Intel VC Exec Arrested in Insider Trading Scam
- Cloud Computing Can Revitalize Your Career as Software Developer
- SOA World Magazine "Readers' Choice Awards" Voting Is Now Open
- Oracle+MySQL Opponents Take to the Barricades
- Virtualization Expo Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Oracle Faces Growing Price for MySQL
- SpringSource Moving to Spring 3.0
- 4th International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo Starts Today
- Deputy CIO of the CIA to Keynote 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- Performance Tuning Essentials for Java
- Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- Google Wave
- IBM Hardware Chief, Intel VC Exec Arrested in Insider Trading Scam
- Cloud Computing Can Revitalize Your Career as Software Developer
- Oracle-Sun: IBM Reportedly Behind Delay
- Citrix Aims To Cripple VMware’s Cloud Designs
- Oracle Trashes HP Relationship for Sun
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- SCO CEO Posts Open Letter to the Open Source Community
- Simula Labs Launches Hosted Delivery Platform To Enable Enterprise Open Source Adoption
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Source Claims SCO Will Sue Google
- How Open Is "Open"? – Industry Luminaries Join the Debate
- Latest SCO News is Plain Weird
- IBM Tells SCO Court It Can't Find AIX-on-Power Code
- SCO Claims Linux Lifted ELF
- Flashback: Investing in 'Professional Open Source' - Exclusive 2004 Interview with David Skok, Matrix Partners
- HP Starts Pushing Desktop Linux
- Linux Business Week Exclusive: Linux Kernel To Be Re-Written To Counter Microsoft FUD






























