Welcome!

Open Source Authors: Victoria Livschitz, Ignacio M. Llorente, Carmen Gonzalez, Michael Meiner, Liz McMillan

News Feed Item

PT Announces Third Quarter 2012 Financial Results

ROCHESTER, N.Y., Nov. 8, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- PT (NASDAQ: PTIX), a leading global provider of advanced network communications solutions, today announced its unaudited financial results for the third quarter 2012.

Revenue in the third quarter 2012 amounted to $4.7 million, compared to $9.0 million in the third quarter 2011.  Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 amounted to $18.0 million, compared to $27.1 million during the corresponding period in 2011.

On the basis of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the net loss in the third quarter 2012 amounted to ($1.7 million), or ($.15) per basic share, based on 11.1 million shares outstanding, including amortization of purchased intangible assets of $.03 per share and stock-based compensation expense of $.01 per share.  The GAAP net loss in the third quarter 2011 amounted to ($.1 million), or ($.01) per basic share, including a restructuring charge of $.01 per share, an impairment charge of $.04 per share, amortization of purchased intangible assets of $.03 per share and stock-based compensation expense of $.01 per share, based on 11.1 million shares outstanding.

The GAAP net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 amounted to ($3.1 million), or ($.28) per basic share, including amortization of purchased intangible assets of $.08 per share and stock-based compensation expense of $.02 per share, based on 11.1 million shares outstanding.  The GAAP net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 amounted to ($1.6 million), or ($.15) per basic share, including a restructuring charge of $.02 per share, an impairment charge of $.04 per share, amortization of purchased intangible assets of $.07 per share, litigation expenses of $.04 per share, and stock-based compensation expense of $.02 per share, based on 11.1 million shares outstanding.

The non-GAAP net loss in the third quarter 2012 amounted to ($1.3 million), or ($.12) per basic share, compared to non-GAAP net income of $.7 million, or $.07 per share in the third quarter 2011.  The non-GAAP net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 amounted to ($2.1 million), or ($.19) per basic share, compared to net income of $.5 million, or $.04 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  Please refer to the reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures contained in this release.

On September 30, 2012, the Company had cash and investments amounting to $14.7 million, working capital of $17.1 million and no long-term debt.

"We are extremely dissatisfied with our third quarter results," said John Slusser, president and chief executive officer.   "After experiencing a dramatic slowdown in telecommunications equipment revenue during the second quarter 2012, we surveyed our customer base to get an updated view of their going forward product requirements and had mixed results.  Our service provider customers generally expect to make additional investments in their network infrastructure while our OEM customers were more reluctant to project requirements because of little or no visibility of demand from their end customers.  Based upon the feedback received and ongoing global economic climate uncertainty, we have concluded that our quarterly revenue run rates will likely not return to the first quarter 2012 level in the near term.  Given this circumstance, we implemented a program to bring our operations more in line with anticipated business opportunities."

On October 31, 2012, PT announced a program to restructure its operations, reduce its workforce, rationalize its product lines, and refocus its resources on initiatives that are more closely aligned with the Company's near-term objectives and market potential.  Specifically, the Company is reducing its personnel by fourteen employees or 10% of its workforce and is recording a non-cash impairment charge against certain of PT's software development costs and purchased intangible assets.  As a result of this action, the Company expects to incur fourth quarter 2012 pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $.5 million, representing employee-related costs which will result in cash expenditures, and approximately $.8 million, which will be recorded as a non-cash impairment charge.  The Company currently estimates that the full annualized cost savings resulting from this restructuring program will be in the range of $1.3 million to $1.5 million in 2013.

About PT (www.pt.com)

PT (NASDAQ: PTIX) is a global supplier of advanced network communications solutions for telecommunication service providers, government communications, and OEM markets.  PT's product portfolio includes IP-centric network elements and applications designed for high availability, scalability, and long life cycle deployments. PT's SEGway™ SS7 and Diameter Signaling Solutions provide affordable, high density signaling and advanced routing for next-generation LTE and IMS networks. These solutions enable IP migration, gateway capabilities, SIP bridging, and core-to-edge distributed intelligence, as well as features such as Number Portability and SMS Spam Defense. PT's Multi-Protocol and Communication Server (MPS) product portfolio enables LAN/WAN, radar and Smart-Grid networks to acquire, distribute and record critical data over IP Networks. PT's industry-leading Monterey MicroTCA and IPnexus® Platforms anchor a growing portfolio of the Company's own solutions. Many other OEMs and application developers leverage PT's carrier-grade platforms and Linux® development environment (PT's NexusWare®). PT is headquartered in Rochester, NY and maintains sales and engineering offices around the world.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for certain forward-looking statements.  This press release contains forward-looking statements which reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and financial performance, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is subject to the safe harbor provisions of those Sections.  The Company's future operating results are subject to various risks and uncertainties and could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and may be affected by various trends and factors which are beyond the Company's control.  These risks and uncertainties include, among other factors, business and economic conditions, rapid technological changes accompanied by frequent new product introductions, competitive pressures, dependence on key customers and the potential loss of key customers, inability to gauge order flows from customers, fluctuations in quarterly and annual results, the reliance on a limited number of third party suppliers, limitations of PT's manufacturing capacity and arrangements, the protection of PT's proprietary technology, errors or defects in our products, the effects of pending or threatened litigation, the dependence on key personnel, changes in critical accounting estimates, potential impairments related to investments, foreign regulations, possible loss or significant curtailment of significant government contracts or subcontracts, and potential material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.  In addition, during weak or uncertain economic periods, customers' visibility deteriorates causing delays in the placement of their orders.  These factors often result in a substantial portion of PT's revenue being derived from orders placed within a quarter and shipped in the final month of the same quarter.  Forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the most recent audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes thereto, Risk Factors, and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company, as contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

As a supplement to the GAAP-based consolidated financial statements contained in this press release, the Company is providing a presentation of non-GAAP financial measures which can be useful to investors to gain an overall understanding of the Company's current financial performance.  Specifically, the Company believes the non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors by excluding certain expenses the Company believes are not indicative of its core operating results.  The non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain expenses such as the effects of (a) amortization of purchased intangible assets, (b) stock-based compensation, (c) restructuring costs, (d) litigation expenses and (e) impairment charges – vendor software. 

Management utilizes a number of different financial measures, both GAAP and non-GAAP, in analyzing and assessing the overall performance of our business, in making operating decisions and forecasting and planning for future periods.  We also consider the use of the non-GAAP financial measures to be helpful in assessing various aspects of our business operations.

Non-GAAP financial measures are not meant to be considered a substitute for the corresponding GAAP financial information and should not be considered in isolation from measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.  Investors are cautioned that there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool and that these measures should only be used to evaluate the Company's results of operations in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP financial information. 

A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures is included herein. 

A conference call will be held on Monday, November 12, at 10:00 a.m., New York time, to discuss the results. All institutional investors can participate in the conference by dialing (866) 494-3746 or (416) 915-1196. The call will be available simultaneously for all other investors at (866) 494-3387 or (416) 915-1198. A digital recording of this conference call may be accessed immediately after its completion from November 12 through November 16, 2012. To access the recording, participants should dial (866) 245-6755 or (416) 915-1035 using passcode 510179. A live webcast of the conference call will be available on the PT website at www.pt.com and will be archived to the site within two hours after the completion of the call.

PT is a trademark of Performance Technologies, Inc. The names of actual companies, products, or services may be the trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of their respective owners in the United States and/or other countries.

 

PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)


ASSETS






September 30,

2012


December 31,

2011





Current assets:





Cash and cash equivalents

$ 6,881,000


$ 9,641,000


Investments

5,830,000


2,798,000


Accounts receivable

4,150,000


5,622,000


Inventories

4,693,000


5,421,000


Prepaid expenses and other assets

1,020,000


1,155,000


Prepaid income taxes

119,000


67,000


Total current assets

22,693,000


24,704,000





Investments

1,974,000


3,362,000

Property, equipment and improvements, net

1,791,000


1,891,000

Software development costs, net

4,451,000


3,932,000

Purchased intangible assets, net

3,756,000


4,390,000


Total assets

$34,665,000


$38,279,000







    


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY






Current liabilities:




       Accounts payable

$   717,000


$ 1,015,000

       Accrued expenses

1,674,000


1,547,000

       Deferred revenue

3,220,000


2,808,000

       Fair value of foreign currency hedges



46,000

       Other payable



999,000

               Total current liabilities

5,611,000


6,415,000

Deferred income taxes

89,000


83,000

               Total liabilities

5,700,000


6,498,000





Stockholders' equity:




       Preferred stock




       Common stock

133,000


133,000

       Additional paid-in capital

17,533,000


17,347,000

       Retained earnings

21,099,000


24,237,000

       Accumulated other comprehensive income

18,000


(118,000)

       Treasury stock

(9,818,000)


(9,818,000)

              Total stockholders' equity

28,965,000


31,781,000

            Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$34,665,000


$38,279,000








 

PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
(unaudited)










Three Months Ended

September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2012


2011


2012


2011









Sales

$ 4,671,000


$ 9,000,000


$18,045,000


$27,125,000

Cost of goods sold

2,870,000


4,454,000


9,611,000


14,419,000

Gross profit

1,801,000


4,546,000


8,434,000


12,706,000









Operating expenses:









Selling and marketing

1,232,000


1,585,000


4,127,000


4,966,000


Research and development

1,221,000


1,593,000


4,349,000


5,342,000


General and administrative

983,000


981,000


3,125,000


3,590,000


Impairment charge-vendor software



400,000




400,000


Restructuring charges



71,000




253,000


Total operating expenses

3,436,000


4,630,000


11,601,000


14,551,000

Loss from operations

(1,635,000)


(84,000)


(3,167,000)


(1,845,000)









Other income, net

42,000


(4,000)


41,000


86,000

Loss before income taxes

(1,593,000)


(88,000)


(3,126,000)


(1,759,000)









Income tax provision (benefit)

80,000


(2,000)


12,000


(123,000)


Net loss

$(1,673,000)


$ (86,000)


$(3,138,000)


$(1,636,000)

















Basic loss per share

$         (.15)


$         (.01)


$           (.28)


$           (.15)









Weighted average common shares

11,116,000


11,116,000


11,116,000


11,116,000























PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
(unaudited)










Three Months Ended

September 30,


Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2012


2011


2012


2011









Gross Profit Reconciliation








   GAAP gross profit

$ 1,801,000


$4,546,000


$ 8,434,000


$12,706,000

      Amortization of purchased intangible assets(a)

302,000


280,000


891,000


812,000

      Stock-based compensation(b)

4,000


3,000


10,000


9,000

         Non-GAAP gross profit

2,107,000


4,829,000


9,335,000


13,527,000

         Non-GAAP gross profit percentage of sales

45.1%


53.7%


51.7%


49.9%









Operating Expense Reconciliation








   GAAP operating expenses

3,436,000


4,630,000


11,601,000


14,551,000

      Stock-based compensation (b)

(57,000)


(63,000)


(176,000)


(225,000)

      Restructuring costs(c)



(71,000)




(253,000)

      Litigation expenses(d)







(414,000)

      Impairment charge-vendor software(e)



(400,000)




(400,000)

          Non-GAAP operating expenses

3,379,000


4,096,000


11,425,000


13,259,000










Net Loss Reconciliation








   GAAP net loss

(1,673,000)


(86,000)


(3,138,000)


(1,636,000)

      Amortization of purchased intangible assets(a)

302,000


280,000


891,000


812,000

      Stock-based compensation(b)

61,000


66,000


186,000


234,000

      Restructuring costs(c)



71,000




253,000

      Litigation expenses(d)







414,000

      Impairment charge-vendor software(e)



400,000




400,000

          Non-GAAP net (loss) income

$(1,310,000)


$  731,000


$  (2,061,000)


$  477,000









Loss per Common Share








   GAAP basic net loss per common share

$           (.15)


$         (.01)


$          (.28)


$          (.15)

   Non-GAAP basic(f) net (loss) income per common share

$           (.12)


$           .07


$          (.19)


$           .04






















The Non-GAAP financial measures above, and their reconciliation to our GAAP results for the periods presented, reflect adjustments relating to the following items:

(a)    Amortization of purchased intangible assets: a non-cash expense arising from the acquisition of intangible assets that the Company is required to amortize over their expected useful lives. The value of purchased intangible assets increased significantly as a result of the acquisition of the USP and SP2000 signaling technologies from GENBAND in January 2011.

(b)    Stock-based compensation costs: a non-cash expense incurred in accordance with share-based compensation accounting guidance.

(c)   Restructuring costs: costs incurred as a result of restructuring activities taken to bring operating expenses more in line with expected revenues. 

(d)  Litigation expenses: legal expenses not indicative of core operating activities.

(e)  Impairment charge - vendor software - One-time impairment charge recorded in connection with the termination of a marketing reseller agreement with a vendor, not indicative of core operating activities.

(f)  Basic and diluted net income per common share are identical for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

SOURCE PT

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.