Open Source Cloud Authors: Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Rajeev Kozhikkattuthodi, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Open Source Cloud

Open Source Cloud: Article

Linux on the Desktop

The need for compromise

It has become something of a cliché that Linux has reached a critical point in its development and adoption. However, this is especially true now when we look at what events are lined up to occur in the near future, and particularly in the desktop area.

Perhaps the most visible event is the impending launch of Microsoft's Vista. Try as they might, this new OS shows every sign of needing hardware replacement, some user training, and considerable support staff training to be truly effective in deployment. Particularly note the last two, often cited as reasons why moving to Linux is expensive and fraught with danger. Of course, Linux doesn't have the added disadvantage of needing a hardware upgrade.

The second event on the horizon is the move to 64 bit hardware on the desktop. 64 bit hardware is commonplace in the datacenter and on Unix/Linux workstations, but not so common sitting on the average end user's desktop. Some may argue that 64 bit hardware just isn't needed on an average desktop. Quite probably, the same people said the same of the move from 16 bit to 32 bit desktops, and their children probably argued against the need to move from 8 to 16 bit machines.

Both of these events are natural places for people to pause and reconsider their whole environments, and any conscientious CIO is going to give the non-Microsoft alternatives a really long, hard look.

So, can we expect a sudden and dramatic shift to Linux on the desktop? Unfortunately, the answer is probably no. Unless some changes take place.

There are several significant roadblocks to widespread adoption on the desktop. These are not technical in nature, and perhaps surprisingly to some people, they do not revolve around licensing (GNU or otherwise). The wars over licensing (open vs. proprietary) have been fought and in the aftermath, the most sensible people have come to the conclusion that both may have their place and that co-existence of both is not impossible. Which form is better for the end-user in the long run is yet to be determined, even if logic does tend to lead one in a specific direction.

The biggest problem is the lack of application software available and the difficulty in making some of it work. This problem has been recognized for some time, and some effort has been put into determining why this is. A few conversations with independent software vendors (ISVs) quickly reveals the problems that they face when they consider creating applications for Linux, or attempting to move existing products to Linux. Some of the most frequently mentioned ones are listed below.

Lack of development tools
This is surprising given the huge amount of development taking place daily on Linux. Closer investigation reveals that what is really meant is a lack of the sort of development environment in which relatively junior developers can be productive without having to completely understand the technologies they are working with. Think IDE (integrated development environment) in the form that it exists in the Microsoft world. Fortunately, the rapid development of Eclipse and its widespread adoption seems to have muted most of these complaints.

A Need for Compromise
Compromise is needed on the Linux side in recognizing that developers will not all be as skilled as we might all expect in a perfect world, and that good documentation, and development environments oriented towards less skilled developers is going to be needed. On the ISV side, some compromise is needed in recognizing that it is neither possible, nor desirable to be able to create development environments that totally mimic those available in the Windows world. Linux is a very different system. Some re-training will be required for developers to become productive. Insulating developers from the differences is not completely possible. This is the price of admission to this new and expanding market.

Vendor lock-in
A surprising one for a free and open system. What they refer to are the differences between the various distributions which, deliberately or not, make writing cross-distribution applications difficult. The differences that they face include different system management interfaces, different package management, different desktop environments, different levels of software (kernel, libraries, utilities) and of course, the inevitable pseudo-proprietary extensions to the systems. This is highly reminiscent of the Unix world, and many of these companies have bad memories of that period.

Compromise is really required on the part of the Linux vendors. Rather than differentiating their product in ways that make it incompatible with other distributions they should be concentrating on ensuring that the user and ISV experience becomes much more uniform across the distributions. There is plenty of scope to differentiate the distributions in the support that they offer as well as the add-on components and services offered, without compromising uniformity at the basic levels of the system.

KDE vs. Gnome
These desktop systems are both competent. They are also different enough that writing an application to be equally at home in both is close to impossible. Neither has the functionality (from the ISV perspective) of the Windows platform. Fortunately, these problems have been recognized by both groups and there are collaborative efforts underway to deal with these problems, with the first release of the Portland project (piloted by OSDL) setting a very hopeful path for the resolution of this problem.

Compromise between the two development groups appears to have begun here, and is leading to some very much appreciated results.

Binary Drivers
The Linux kernel is relatively unfriendly to drivers supplied in binary form, with interfaces which mutate and evolve rapidly. The standard answer to anyone wanting to use their own drivers is that they should provide them in source form. Unfortunately, this produces some real conflicts with the world of proprietary hardware. In many cases vendors argue that the driver source would expose just too much about how their product worked, allowing unscrupulous third parties to clone the hardware and undercut them on price since these clones would not have R&D costs to recoup. There is some truth to this, although many devices could easily be supported by open sourced drivers. Efforts by the Open Source Community to educate ISVs on the process of open sourcing and supporting their drivers have had some limited success, but this remains a very problematic area from all perspectives

Compromise on this requires some fairly fundamental changes in attitude on both sides. ISVs requiring that their drivers need to remain in binary form need to understand the philosophical and practical difficulties that the Linux development community have with this approach, and perhaps review their strategies for keeping their trade secrets through obfuscation, which is all that binary drivers really are. A determined person or group can always decompile and analyze a binary file.

Compromise on the Linux development side needs to recognize that for commercial success, supporting binary drivers is probably inescapable. The changing kernel interfaces argument really doesn't hold much water. At the top level, there are a set of fixed interfaces (POSIX) which the kernel developers are not free to change as they wish. They have to live with that interface as a constraint. The feasibility of providing a fixed set of interfaces for drivers has already been mostly proven by the NdisWrapper project, which provides the standard set of Windows APIs enabling Windows drivers to successfully run within the Linux kernel. It is far from unreasonable to ask that Linux provides its own stable set of interfaces and specification.

What these issues mean to an ISV is that they look at the number of Linux systems in use, and see a critical mass, enough for them to make it worthwhile investing in creating/moving products to Linux. But, on closer examination they find that the base is fragmented. There isn't just Linux, but RedHat Linux, Novell Linux, Linspire Linux, Lycoris Linux, Debian Linux, Mandrake Linux ...

For an impressive list of Linux distributions available take a look at:


The fragmentation means more work for ISVs, work in development, work in creating potentially multiple distributions, and work in supporting the product across a range of different Linux variants, each evolving at a different pace.

Many ISVs decide that Linux is not yet a platform of interest. The day they decide otherwise is probably the day Linux hits the tipping point and becomes a mainstream reality on the desktop as well as in the datacenter.

More Stories By Philip Peake

Philip Peake is a professional services consultant, and has worked for a variety of companies including Netscape, AOL, Sun Microsystems and OSDL.
With over 25 years experience of UNIX based systems in Internet and
Intranet enterprise environments, using Linux has been a natural evolution.
Philip has a Batchelor of Science degree in computer science from
the University of Keele in the United Kingdom.

Comments (2) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

Most Recent Comments
Mirza Borogovac 11/05/06 11:16:48 AM EST

I do not think that there is such thing as linux tiping point. That is early 90's thinking when PC market was young and things happened rapidly. PC market is more mature now and any change in marketplace is more likely to happen slowly and over years and even decades rather than within a single year.

Haim Roitgrund 11/05/06 01:13:45 AM EST

How refreshing to see some informed, balanced, yet constructive assessment of this topic, instead of the all-too-common zealot fare.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural networks. We’re in the midst of a wave of excitement around AI such as hasn’t been seen for a few decades. But those previous periods of inflated expectations led to troughs of disappointment. Will this time be different? Most likely. Applications of AI such as predictive analytics are already decreasing costs and improving reliability of industrial machinery. Furthermore, the funding and research going into AI now comes from a wide range of com...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 21st Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound change in personal and enterprise IT since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago. All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devic...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a client-oriented software development company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software company that develops and delivers turn-key mobile apps, websites, web services, and complex software systems for startups and enterprises. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business...
SYS-CON Events announced today that GrapeUp, the leading provider of rapid product development at the speed of business, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Grape Up is a software company, specialized in cloud native application development and professional services related to Cloud Foundry PaaS. With five expert teams that operate in various sectors of the market acr...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Ayehu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on October 31 - November 2, 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara California. Ayehu provides IT Process Automation & Orchestration solutions for IT and Security professionals to identify and resolve critical incidents and enable rapid containment, eradication, and recovery from cyber security breaches. Ayehu provides customers greater control over IT infras...
In this presentation, Striim CTO and founder Steve Wilkes will discuss practical strategies for counteracting fraud and cyberattacks by leveraging real-time streaming analytics. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Steve Wilkes, Founder and Chief Technology Officer at Striim, will provide a detailed look into leveraging streaming data management to correlate events in real time, and identify potential breaches across IoT and non-IoT systems throughout the enterprise. Strategies for processing massive ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Cloud Academy named "Bronze Sponsor" of 21st International Cloud Expo which will take place October 31 - November 2, 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Cloud Academy is the industry’s most innovative, vendor-neutral cloud technology training platform. Cloud Academy provides continuous learning solutions for individuals and enterprise teams for Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and the most popular cloud com...
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, an entertainment executive/TV producer turned serial entrepreneur, presented a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to ma...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st Int\ernational Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive advantage. By offering a suite of proven hosting and management services, Enzu wants companies to focus on the core of their ...
We build IoT infrastructure products - when you have to integrate different devices, different systems and cloud you have to build an application to do that but we eliminate the need to build an application. Our products can integrate any device, any system, any cloud regardless of protocol," explained Peter Jung, Chief Product Officer at Pulzze Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
SYS-CON Events announced today that IBM has been named “Diamond Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st Cloud Expo, which will take place on October 31 through November 2nd 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, California.
SYS-CON Events announced today that CA Technologies has been named "Platinum Sponsor" of SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. CA Technologies helps customers succeed in a future where every business - from apparel to energy - is being rewritten by software. From planning to development to management to security, CA creates software that fuels transformation for companies in the applic...
Amazon started as an online bookseller 20 years ago. Since then, it has evolved into a technology juggernaut that has disrupted multiple markets and industries and touches many aspects of our lives. It is a relentless technology and business model innovator driving disruption throughout numerous ecosystems. Amazon’s AWS revenues alone are approaching $16B a year making it one of the largest IT companies in the world. With dominant offerings in Cloud, IoT, eCommerce, Big Data, AI, Digital Assista...
Multiple data types are pouring into IoT deployments. Data is coming in small packages as well as enormous files and data streams of many sizes. Widespread use of mobile devices adds to the total. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists looked at the tools and environments that are being put to use in IoT deployments, as well as the team skills a modern enterprise IT shop needs to keep things running, get a handle on all this data, and deliver...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...