Welcome!

Open Source Cloud Authors: Pat Romanski, Yeshim Deniz, Dana Gardner, Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White

Related Topics: Open Source Cloud, Java IoT, Linux Containers

Open Source Cloud: Article

Flashback: Investing in 'Professional Open Source' - Exclusive 2004 Interview with David Skok, Matrix Partners

Skok Tells Why Investing $10M in JBoss Was Bold But Logical

  • April: Exclusive Interview with Dale Fuller

    This past February David Skok's new VC firm - Matrix Partners - orchestrated, with Accel, a $10 million investment in JBoss, Inc. This first round of funding in an open source company was a bold play, but then David Skok, famous in the Java arena as the founder of SilverStream Software - acquired by Novell in 2002 - is no stranger to bold moves.

    The first question then, naturally enough, is to ask Skok whether this investment is somehow a contradiction, or whether there is indeed money to be made from open source?

    "We think that there's definitely money to be made," Skok says without hesitation. "Red Hat's a clear example," he adds. "They're now profitable on around a $100m annual revenue run-rate. And we're still in the early days of the open source movement."

     

    Curious about the business model he sees underlying OSS, I ask him how he usually explains it to fellow members of the investment community.

    There are two business models, Skok explains, "dual license" and "support."

    "In the dual license model," he continues, "followed by companies such as MySQL, software is available free with a restrictive GPL license, and available for a small fee with a less restrictive commercial license.

    "You also see companies like SourceFire," Skok adds - they are the ones who developed Snort, the network intrusion detection system - "offering an upgrade product to Snort for a fee."

    Then there is the second model, the support model. "JBoss follows the support model," Skok says. "What they call 'Professional Open Source'."

    Customers Want a 'Throat to Choke'
    There's one compelling reason why this model is so successful, Skok notes. "It's driven by a very important customer demand: the customer wants a 'throat to choke' when they move from development into production, and know that they can only get accountability and guaranteed response times if they pay for support."

    Is "Professional Open Source" the wave of the future? I ask.

    "Open source should be thought of as a different way of developing software," Skok replies. "With Professional Open Source, we should stop seeing open source developers as unemployed student types wearing Birkenstocks. Specifically, open source for middleware software makes a lot of sense because it's the most open/naked state of code and the peer review process leads to very robust, fast, and open stacks."

    Given that open source is fast becoming a multimillion-dollar - most likely a multibillion-dollar - business, I ask Skok who the stakeholders are who can expect to benefit.

    "I think that the greatest beneficiaries are customers and independent software vendors (ISVs) who will benefit from high-quality, royalty-free platforms," he replies.

    Skok then adds a thought about profitability, for open source and profit are not mutually exclusive it seems. "One of the things that impressed us most about JBoss," he says, "is that it has been profitable since the beginning, and expects to continue operating that way into the future."

    The $10 million capital was primarily raised to strengthen their balance sheet, Skok explains, reassuring customers that they are dealing with a company that is here for the long term. "They will also use the capital to expand operations into more regions and scale up support capabilities," he adds.

    On a technical note, while JBoss has always been applauded for being robust and scalable, it's never had a GUI-based IDE, thus leaving the mass marketplace solely in the hands of closed source competitors. So I ask Skok what he thinks about the recent idea of plugging JBoss into the Eclipse development framework, making the product a legitimate option for the thousands of developers who prefer a GUI. Will that transform JBoss's fortunes from niche player to mass-market player, does he think? Does that partly explain the timing of this investment?

    "In today's market," Skok answers, "it's no longer necessary to get GUI tools and an app server from one company. In addition to the Eclipse project, JBoss is already integrated in all leading IDEs: JBuilder X, Compuware OptimalJ 3.0, Eclipse, IntelliJ, and so on.

    "I keep speaking to new startups that are coming out with hot new GUI-based development tools for things like UI development, and building XML services-oriented applications," he continues, "and they all tell me that they are planning to ship with JBoss as the default application server. They tell me that they initially picked JBoss because it's royalty free, but they then grew to love it because it's highly stable and has a very compact, modular architecture.

    "The surveys that we discovered during our due diligence," Skok adds, "showed that JBoss was number one in terms of both developer and OEM/ISV usage, and had grown its enterprise market share to 27%. In the last year, they had grown their market share more than twice as fast as either BEA or IBM. They have managed to attract an incredible base of ISVs including companies like Apple Computer, Sterling Commerce, and Mercury Interactive to name just a few. Those were some of the key factors behind our decision to invest."

    'Disruptive' Open Source Is the Future
    Is the JBoss, Inc., business model, though - i.e., charging for support - the perfect business model, or does Skok expect to need to tweak it moving forward to ensure that the Matrix/Accel $10 million is leveraged to the max?

    "We believe that their business model is the right one for today and the future," he maintains. "It's totally in tune with what customers want, which is low ownership costs for software, and a fully accountable vendor for support."

    It's also a very nice business model financially, he adds, as support contracts are generally renewed, "so you end up with a very predictable revenue stream that only grows over time."

    However, as with any business, Skok points out, "It's important to keep listening to the customers to see if there are tweaks that are needed going forward."

    What about the wider picture, beyond JBoss - does Skok expect a wave of VC money to now pile into open source in the next five years in the same way as it did, say, to the wireless space in the past five years? Or does he think it will be an altogether more cautious process, more on a case-by-case basis?

    "Open source is very hot right now," he says, "driven by the clear success of Linux in the enterprise. We have IBM to thank for that; I've heard that they've committed $2 billion to Linux marketing."

    Wishing to further explore the whole Linux phenomenon, I ask him why he thinks it has taken off so astonishingly. He explains that the key to it, according to the customers he speaks to, is the financial attraction of escaping lock-in. "Customers tell me that they're attracted to Linux because of 'Intel Economics' - the ability to ride the price curve of Intel-based computing, as opposed to being locked into proprietary Unix platforms like Sun," Skok says.

    "The initial open source successes are Linux and Apache," he continues. "However, customers are looking at the rest of the infrastructure stack and realizing that there are the same cost and lock-in avoidance benefits to be had."

    Skok ranks JBoss as one of the four greatest open source opportunities right now: "The two leading companies, behind Red Hat and SUSE, that will benefit next are JBoss and MySQL. There will be others, but it's my belief that only a few will be big enough for venture capital style returns."

    What about the whole open source versus proprietary debate: Does Skok think it's operationally - and legally - feasible to commingle the two types of software? Or does he fear like many that we're just ushering in an era of energy-sapping litigation, as IP issues are contested by teams of lawyers in the courtrooms of America and indeed the world?

    There are a couple of main bumps in the road, Skok reckons: one is the GPL and the other is the whole question of intellectual property. "Users of open source need to watch out for the GPL license, which can require that they open source their own software under certain circumstances," he notes. JBoss, Skok adds, uses LGPL (Lesser GPL), which eliminates this problem.

    The SCO lawsuit, says Skok, highlights the second issue - whether you're protected from IP problems. "JBoss solves this problem by indemnifying its customers against those liabilities. Novell and HP have chosen to do the same thing for their customers buying Linux."

    What does JBoss, Inc.'s, newfound "Professional Open Source" status do to the whole landscape - do proprietary app server giants, like IBM's WebSphere, BEA's WebLogic, and Oracle's IAS 10g need to worry that JBoss will make them redundant, I wonder.

    "JBoss (and open source in general) is highly disruptive to the business models of those vendors," Skok replies. "The recent recession put an extreme focus on costs, and forced IT to look for ways to do more with less. In the late '90s it was cool to tell your friends about the latest Sun E10k box that you had purchased for over a million dollars. Now it's cool to tell them how much money you've saved your company by deploying Linux on commodity Intel boxes."

    Skok tells me how he's spoken to several customers who had initially chosen WebLogic or WebSphere as their app server of choice, and then switched to JBoss "because of the extraordinary cost savings," as he puts it.

    "Their developers had all recommended JBoss as their preferred product," he adds. "It took a budget squeeze for them to take a chance and try it, but once they saw how good the product was, they weren't going back."

    Technology Startups: Then and Now
    Much has changed in the world of technology and business since Skok founded SilverStream as "The eBusiness Platform Company," so I was interested to hear what he felt was different in the landscape for startups today compared to how it was then.

    "When we founded SilverStream, it was right when enterprises were starting to use the Web for business purposes," he recalls. "There was untold excitement and promise, and the future was wide open.

    "Enterprises felt a lot of pressure to move quickly or be 'Amazoned.' That led them to ignore their traditional purchasing habits and buy from startups to gain a time-to-market advantage.

    "After the bubble," he continues, "the pendulum swung too far the other way. No one wanted to buy from startups, and all the shelfware had eroded trust in sales promises of magical business gains. The pendulum is starting to swing back to normal, but it's still an extraordinarily tough environment. Products have to provide really clear demonstrable value and significant ROI in a short period of time. Lots of reference-able customers are crucial, and frequently startups need a channel partner to help solve the 'safe choice' problem."

    In those days, Skok recounts, it was essential to build market share quickly, at any cost: all focus was on revenue growth, and profitability was considered very unfashionable. "These days," he says, "the focus is on capital efficiency, building businesses with the minimum amount of capital." That means a strong focus on expense control. Rushing to get to market is less important than really getting the product right and making the customer totally satisfied.

    "We're back to the days where it will take four to five years to build a real company, and the only people starting them are those with a true passion for the technology and their customers," adds Skok. "I've always believed that the only way to make money is not to focus on making money, but to focus on building real value and making your customers happy. In the bubble, we had lots of the wrong kinds of people starting companies, trying to make a quick buck."

    So much for what's different. But there must be similarities too, "eternal truths" of the startup game, if you will.

    Skok agrees. "What hasn't changed is that you still need to focus on building an exceptional management team consisting of only A players," he says.

    "A players attract other A players; B players attract C players. The difference in performance between an A player and a B player is enormous, whether it be development, sales, or any other function.

    "Over many years," Skok says, "VC firms have collected a lot of wisdom about what it takes to succeed. The key ingredients that we look for are:

    1. An outstanding management team
    2. A market that is feeling real pain, that is large and growing
    3. Long-term sustainable differentiation/ barriers to entry
    I ask Skok what was it like at first for him personally, transitioning from serial entrepreneur to VC? "I guess it was like moving from being a parent to a grandparent," he replies.

    "As a parent you have constant day-to-day involvement with the child including all the highs and lows (changing nappies, etc.). As a grandparent, you're less involved, get to share in some of the fun, but also have less of the day-to day-stress. The biggest change is switching from making all the decisions to becoming an advisor and mentor to the CEO."

    Technology Insights
    He doesn't own businesses outside of technology. "I think my expertise is limited to the technology field, so other than professionally managed stock market holdings, I have stayed away from other investments. My job also requires total focus and doesn't leave much time for anything else."

    So he doesn't object when I ask him to name one thing that Java has gotten completely right - and, conversely, one thing in Java's history he wished had turned out differently.

    "Java got two things right," Skok says. "First, platform independence - which means the same app will run on any platform unchanged. And second, standardization - which means vendor choice and competition."

    What Java has gotten wrong, in his opinion, is that "it has become too complex."

    "That complexity is necessary in certain respects (as distributed applications are complex in nature). Expert developers appreciate the need for this. However, not enough attention has been paid to simplifying development, and making Java more accessible to a less expert audience who I believe make up at least 60% of the corporate developer audience."

    The most promising answer to the over-complication of J2EE, Skok adds, is something JBoss introduced in their 4.0 release: aspect oriented programming.

    "AOP has the potential to greatly reduce the complexity, allowing developers to add capabilities like persistence, remoting, security, transactional integrity, and so on, to plain old Java objects (POJOs) without the complexity of today's EJBs. This is close to the .NET approach. JBoss is working hard on the EJB 3.0 specification to help bring in these kinds of advances. They're hopeful that that group will find a way to make enterprise Java easier to use. This is important to keep the overall market share of Java versus .NET."

    In addition, Skok believes that the J2EE world needs high productivity GUI tools for less expert developers in the area of UI development. Things to help them graphically design page flows, and build data-bound forms and reports.

    "Today .NET is the only serious challenger to Java in the enterprise," he says. "I'm less hopeful for Java on the client so long as Microsoft continues to fight it. But I haven't written it off. I think that we'll continue to see both .NET and Java as competing platforms in the foreseeable future. Web services will greatly increase interoperability."

    What's his response to those who argue that Sun has somehow lost its moral right to exercise exclusive control over Java and that Java ought now to be open sourced? "I'm in favor of open sourcing the source code for the Java reference implementations, but allowing Sun to retain the rights to the Java brand. Sun could still maintain control over the verification and certification of products based on them passing Sun's compliance tests. That model will dramatically improve the quality of Java, give developers the comfort that they are not playing in a totally Sun-controlled world, and have the ability to contribute to the reference implementation, while still leaving Sun a way to make money out of Java.

    "In my opinion that would increase the acceptance of Java in the market, and reduce the chances of success for competitive languages like C#."

    Beyond Java: Technologies to Watch
    Wearing his new generalist hat as a general partner at Matrix Partners, Skok has a bird's eye view of hot investment areas beyond the Java world. Several areas are really interesting right now, he says: utility computing and datacenter virtualization, wireless and mobility, offshoring, RFID, and security, to name just a few.

    "I'm personally very excited about the opportunities around the datacenter," Skok explains. "It's clear that today's datacenters are way too complex to manage, and can't respond fast enough to changing business needs."

    The datacenter of the future, he believes, will be very different: there will be a big pool of storage, a large pool of processors, and a big network pipe coming into a lights-out facility.

    "You'll only need to go in there to add new processors/disks or to remove broken units. New virtual computers will be created out of these pools via a simple GUI. These virtual computers will share resources from the pools, but will be isolated from one another. They will be dynamically allocated more or fewer resources as demand grows and shrinks. My investment play in this area is a company called Katana."

    "RFID is also very hot right now," Skok says, "driven by a mandate from Wal-Mart that its top 100 suppliers have to start shipping them pallets that are identified by RFID tags.

    "This was followed by a similar mandate from the Department of Defense. That has kicked off a mad scramble by their vendors to become RFID enabled. We've invested in a company called OAT Systems, and they are overwhelmed with customer demand."

    Infosecurity is another interesting area, he says. "One of the driving forces is regulations such as HIPAA, GLBA, etc. We're seeing a fair number of business plans focused on auditing and protecting access to information assets in databases, files, and so on."

    Skok has also spent a lot of time investigating grid computing. "I'm less enthusiastic in the short term, though," he says. "Grid computing today works best for technical computing applications where the workload can be easily split into modules that can be run remotely in parallel. It also requires that applications be rewritten to support a Grid API (OGSA being the key standard).

    "When I look at enterprises, I see mostly applications that cannot be run remotely as they all require access to a single database, and I see a huge reluctance to rewrite applications. What's more interesting to enterprises is the utility computing model where they can run these applications unchanged on a shared infrastructure that responds dynamically to changing workloads. That will be a much bigger market in the short to medium term."

    Over time, grid computing could become more interesting, he conceded - "as we move to highly modularized applications built out of Web service components."

    Skok ends by stating how VCs feel about the current environment, after going through the tech recession of the last few years.

    "There's a definitely increased optimism right now. We're starting to see companies meeting or beating their plans once again. As an example, one of my portfolio companies, Netezza, had a very aggressive forecast for its fourth quarter, and was able to bring in bookings that were double that target. We haven't seen that in a long time.

    "The public markets are getting better, and will be helped by the IPOs of Google and Salesforce.com. And there is a lot of M&A activity.

    "Off-setting that positive news," Skok adds, "we still have an environment where there is too much venture capital chasing too few deals; an overhang from the bubble. This means that there is overfunding in hot areas. As an example, there were no less than 64 companies building WiFi chips when we last counted. I predict that in the long run only the top-tier venture firms will make money and survive. They have access to the best deals, and have the most experience in helping those companies build for success and avoid pitfalls."

    Finally, is there such a thing as an "ultimate software solution" - or does Skok view that as a mere mirage? "I guess it would have to be a system where you could think at it, and have it interpret your thoughts to build fully functional, scalable, reliable, secure applications automatically," he says. "It would also want to behave more like biological systems: i.e., be autonomic (self-healing), able to detect changing needs in the environment, and suggest ways to evolve itself.

    "Is that a mirage? For the time being, I guess so..."

  • More Stories By Jeremy Geelan

    Jeremy Geelan is Chairman & CEO of the 21st Century Internet Group, Inc. and an Executive Academy Member of the International Academy of Digital Arts & Sciences. Formerly he was President & COO at Cloud Expo, Inc. and Conference Chair of the worldwide Cloud Expo series. He appears regularly at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences across six continents. You can follow him on twitter: @jg21.

    Comments (5) View Comments

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Add your comment
    You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

    In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


    Most Recent Comments
    Rickard 05/18/04 01:17:09 AM EDT

    More about "Professional OpenSource":
    http://jroller.com/page/rickard/20040517

    john 04/27/04 12:47:03 PM EDT

    Very useful article. To learn more about JBoss in the open source space, but also, for insights on VC's changing perspective in a tougher IT environment.

    Viiky 04/09/04 12:06:12 PM EDT

    Excellent article, Came to know about "Skok", first time, very interesting, will look for such article on this site.
    Why I liked this article is because, I also like to find and investigate the industry move, and "Skok" is inspiring to me.

    -Vikky

    efp 04/08/04 08:59:26 AM EDT

    "the over-complication of J2EE"

    Has everything not been said then?

    By the way, the general public's appetite for RFID is comparable to its taste and acceptance of genetically modified food or hormones in milk.

    The only way to force it down the throat of the public, is to make it illegal to discuss it (like hormones in milk) and to mandate everybody to use it. Even Walmart can't do that. You need the government to use brute force and to "create the market".

    Daniel Howard 04/07/04 01:23:04 PM EDT

    To seize upon a minor point, Skok states:

    "''That complexity is necessary in certain respects (as distributed applications are complex in nature). Expert developers appreciate the need for this. However, not enough attention has been paid to simplifying development, and making Java more accessible to a less expert audience who I believe make up at least 60% of the corporate developer audience.''"

    "The most promising answer to the over-complication of J2EE, Skok adds, is something JBoss introduced in their 4.0 release: aspect oriented programming."

    AOP is definitely a revolution along the same lines that OOP was a revolution. Like OOP, it will only simplify development for expert programmers who learn it well, not for the less expert audience. Like OOP, poorly written AOP will be even more difficult and error-prone than poorly written J2EE.

    Even today, I know many people who misunderstand OOP and, heck, OOP has been mainstream for 10 years. AOP involves a similar leap of understanding and it will take years for the majority of programmers to accept it. Even then, like OOP, most programmers will not dedicate themselves to become expert in it and, thus, only gain limited benefits.

    It is highly doubtful that AOP will do anything to help that 60%, ever.

    @ThingsExpo Stories
    DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
    WebRTC services have already permeated corporate communications in the form of videoconferencing solutions. However, WebRTC has the potential of going beyond and catalyzing a new class of services providing more than calls with capabilities such as mass-scale real-time media broadcasting, enriched and augmented video, person-to-machine and machine-to-machine communications. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Luis Lopez, CEO of Kurento, introduced the technologies required for implementing these idea...
    Every successful software product evolves from an idea to an enterprise system. Notably, the same way is passed by the product owner's company. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Oleg Lola, CEO of MobiDev, will provide a generalized overview of the evolution of a software product, the product owner, the needs that arise at various stages of this process, and the value brought by a software development partner to the product owner as a response to these needs.
    The WebRTC Summit New York, to be held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, announces that its Call for Papers is now open. Topics include all aspects of improving IT delivery by eliminating waste through automated business models leveraging cloud technologies. WebRTC Summit is co-located with 20th International Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo. WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web co...
    Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
    Who are you? How do you introduce yourself? Do you use a name, or do you greet a friend by the last four digits of his social security number? Assuming you don’t, why are we content to associate our identity with 10 random digits assigned by our phone company? Identity is an issue that affects everyone, but as individuals we don’t spend a lot of time thinking about it. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Ben Klang, Founder & President of Mojo Lingo, discussed the impact of technology on identity. Sho...
    Technology vendors and analysts are eager to paint a rosy picture of how wonderful IoT is and why your deployment will be great with the use of their products and services. While it is easy to showcase successful IoT solutions, identifying IoT systems that missed the mark or failed can often provide more in the way of key lessons learned. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Peter Vanderminden, Principal Industry Analyst for IoT & Digital Supply Chain to Flatiron Strategies, will focus on how IoT depl...
    Data is an unusual currency; it is not restricted by the same transactional limitations as money or people. In fact, the more that you leverage your data across multiple business use cases, the more valuable it becomes to the organization. And the same can be said about the organization’s analytics. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Bill Schmarzo, CTO for the Big Data Practice at Dell EMC, introduced a methodology for capturing, enriching and sharing data (and analytics) across the organization...
    With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now ...
    WebRTC is about the data channel as much as about video and audio conferencing. However, basically all commercial WebRTC applications have been built with a focus on audio and video. The handling of “data” has been limited to text chat and file download – all other data sharing seems to end with screensharing. What is holding back a more intensive use of peer-to-peer data? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Dr Silvia Pfeiffer, WebRTC Applications Team Lead at National ICT Australia, looked at differ...
    The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
    "ReadyTalk is an audio and web video conferencing provider. We've really come to embrace WebRTC as the platform for our future of technology," explained Dan Cunningham, CTO of ReadyTalk, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at WebRTC Summit at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
    In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, John Jelinek IV, a web developer at Linux Academy, will discuss why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers...
    IoT is at the core or many Digital Transformation initiatives with the goal of re-inventing a company's business model. We all agree that collecting relevant IoT data will result in massive amounts of data needing to be stored. However, with the rapid development of IoT devices and ongoing business model transformation, we are not able to predict the volume and growth of IoT data. And with the lack of IoT history, traditional methods of IT and infrastructure planning based on the past do not app...
    The many IoT deployments around the world are busy integrating smart devices and sensors into their enterprise IT infrastructures. Yet all of this technology – and there are an amazing number of choices – is of no use without the software to gather, communicate, and analyze the new data flows. Without software, there is no IT. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation; Alan Williamson, Principal ...
    WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
    SYS-CON Media announced today that @WebRTCSummit Blog, the largest WebRTC resource in the world, has been launched. @WebRTCSummit Blog offers top articles, news stories, and blog posts from the world's well-known experts and guarantees better exposure for its authors than any other publication. @WebRTCSummit Blog can be bookmarked ▸ Here @WebRTCSummit conference site can be bookmarked ▸ Here
    A critical component of any IoT project is what to do with all the data being generated. This data needs to be captured, processed, structured, and stored in a way to facilitate different kinds of queries. Traditional data warehouse and analytical systems are mature technologies that can be used to handle certain kinds of queries, but they are not always well suited to many problems, particularly when there is a need for real-time insights.
    Providing secure, mobile access to sensitive data sets is a critical element in realizing the full potential of cloud computing. However, large data caches remain inaccessible to edge devices for reasons of security, size, format or limited viewing capabilities. Medical imaging, computer aided design and seismic interpretation are just a few examples of industries facing this challenge. Rather than fighting for incremental gains by pulling these datasets to edge devices, we need to embrace the i...
    Web Real-Time Communication APIs have quickly revolutionized what browsers are capable of. In addition to video and audio streams, we can now bi-directionally send arbitrary data over WebRTC's PeerConnection Data Channels. With the advent of Progressive Web Apps and new hardware APIs such as WebBluetooh and WebUSB, we can finally enable users to stitch together the Internet of Things directly from their browsers while communicating privately and securely in a decentralized way.