Welcome!

Open Source Authors: Dmitriy Stepanov, Carmen Gonzalez, Lacey Thoms, Yeshim Deniz, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Open Source

Open Source: Article

Linux Business Week Exclusive: Linux Kernel To Be Re-Written To Counter Microsoft FUD

Linux Leaders Plot "Operation Open Gates"

IBM, Intel, the Open Source Development Labs, where Linux creator Linus Torvalds works, and other industry lights are planning to rob Microsoft of the ability to scare customers off of Linux by saying that the operating system is a patent infringer, informed sources say.

On January 25 they will supposedly announce that a consortium has been created that will rewrite the components in the Linux kernel that, it has been alleged, tread on other people's IP - or at least the 27 Microsoft patents that Linux supposedly infringes.

The consortium will reportedly be underwritten by the state of Oregon and the city of Beaverton and will recruit its staff from local universities, which will also be backing the effort. The governor of Oregon and the mayor of Beaverton will reportedly be at the announcement.

The tactic is called "Operation Open Gates."

The Linux kernel supposedly infringes on 283 (unidentified) patents according to the wannabe insurance start-up Open Source Risk Management. The patents were reviewed by Free Software Foundation counsel Daniel Ravicher, a patent attorney who also runs the Public Patent Foundation.

Ravicher refused to identify the patents, in order that Linux users couldn't be charged with willful infringement.

Microsoft's patents are regarded as the most dangerous, although at least another third of the 283 patents are owned by other people with little to lose in threatening enterprise Linux users with litigation in hopes of winning a handsome settlement. The rest are owned by companies known to be friendly to Linux like IBM, HP, Intel, and Novell.

More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara

Comments (49) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Denis Robert 02/10/05 08:03:58 AM EST

Why hasn't O'Gara been fired yet??? I don't get it: When someone repeatedly invents "news" reports in a respectable news organization, they usually get fired, don't they? O'Gara's imagination is running wild these day, and SYS-CON's insistence on publishing her ramblings puts them in the same league as FOX"News".

MG 01/28/05 05:38:53 PM EST

Michael,
You are a bit wrong. The announcement was made and it was just as ODSL claimed it was. It is a new lab for open source development; including help with coding, testing and other bells and whistles. It is a "seed" lab to help developers and the open source community to develop products that are able to work within the guidelines of GPL. They will also help them develop market strategies and processes that works hand in hand with GPL and the spirit of open source while allowing them to build a viable business.

You are right about everything else though. She did cry "wolf" and I personally feel she knew exactly what she was doing; thus the silence.

This should be a sign to all the MOG supporters that she is not always on the up and up. I’m not going to claim she has an agenda, though that may be true. I can’t because I really don’t know for sure except the evidence seems to build that she does. You see, I did not ask “unnamed resources”. I didn’t talk to the “people in the know”. I rather have verifiable answers from real sources, with real names and faces. It simply amazes me that people follow her words blindly like lemmings. Do you own research people! One site and one writer do not make its news indisputable.

Michael 01/28/05 02:11:17 PM EST

Hey, the deadline for "open gates" has passed and still no announcement, Maureen. Time for a retraction, yet? Time to admit you were had? Time to get off your butt and actually research articles instead of regurgitating press releases? No, I didn't think so. Move on, nothing to see here.

Well 01/21/05 08:36:28 AM EST

Maureen reports the story but I am waiting for "more news" form the "Utah Court" today, that would be real interesting to see!

I wonder how people will interpret the news which did not come out yet.

AllEars 01/21/05 07:24:24 AM EST

So what will MOG today tell us about the SCO v IBM decision yesterday? The federal magistrate has handed a partial victory SCO surely? I do hope there won't be any gloating from Maureen.

JRB 01/20/05 07:19:58 PM EST

First off, As long as Linux has been here, the chances of it infringing upon others IP, is very unlikely, to do this from my understanding they must find complete reproduction of thier coding. To just toss a patent up and then go back hunting through code tha is similar to it is absurd. Any judge with good sense should release the patent and place it with Linus and in doing so, really breaking this streak of BS going on now, they have been shown time and again that it was his own code.
The only reason I see for them wanting to rewrite is for thier own personal chance of putting in code that "They" might be able to claim patent on as well. This OS is one of the best for one reason and one only because it is open to all. Rahter then rewite I personally would attempt to counter and claim first creation and then turn back and let them be the ones pleading for mercy.

anal 01/20/05 06:10:53 PM EST

poor BG, seems to be visiting us from another planet, as do a number of other Anti-linux morons.
As a supposidly intellegent race, we seem to specialize in shooting our self in the foot.
Again & again & again!!

BG 01/20/05 04:09:51 PM EST

My email to Maureen,

Dear Maureen,

As usual, you have gotten to the folks behind the scenes at OSDL and found out Linux is getting rewritten to evade
patent infringement claims and to remove the stolen SCO
intellectual property that's riddled all through Linux. I realize these communists are screaming as loud as they can, but you are doing a good thing pointing out that open source really does steal otehr peoples property.

I salute your courage and candor in having the backbone to report the truth about Linux to the world.

Rodd Ahrenstorff 01/20/05 02:35:02 PM EST

My email to Maureen:

As a faithful reader and subscriber to sys-con publications, I would certainly appreciate a published explanation regarding the story linked below. Based on recent published accounts from those very parties mentioned in the story, your original work is part fabrication or at least based on false information from "informed sources". It would appear no further research went into the details of this article on your behalf.

Maureen, this really undermines your readers faith in you, as an unbiased IT analyst, and further erodes the reputation of LBW and sys-con in general. Please either retract this original story or publish an explanation for the factual discrepancies. People can fogive mistakes when made, but delaying a public reply is only asking for more trouble. I'll be waiting...

Thanks for your time,
(signed)

Jackie Smith 01/20/05 01:44:59 AM EST

Reading the Ads is much more useful than the O'Gara's smelly garbage! O'Gara is the secret weapon of the LBW's competition - let's get rid of her - once and forever...
If I were O'Gara I would resign voluntarily after so much negative response from the LBW's readers.

Michael 01/19/05 08:40:26 AM EST

It's simple, really. If O'Gara's subject in an article is Linux, 90%+ will be outright lies and fabrications. The woman absolutely despises Linux and open source, and feels like anything is justified in the effort to slow its progress. That she writes for the unquestionably anti-Linux yellowsheet called "Linux Business Week" is sort of poetic.

JD 01/18/05 09:30:39 PM EST

April Fool! Oh, it's not April 1st. I guess the jokes is on you then.

Fewclues 01/18/05 09:26:47 PM EST

Stop and realize how most of us hate Microsoft's tactics, and some actually hate Bill Gates and some just hate Windows. Well add all that together and then stand in front of a mirror and you have MOG's feeling about Linux. She is a clever author of a lot of fiction that gets some bad rumors to rumbling. I say she's had all of us!

Michael 01/18/05 01:50:41 PM EST

OSDL denies that there is any truth in this story. Someone is lying. My money is on OSDL as the truthful one.

Mark Murphy 01/18/05 01:17:16 PM EST

Here's a link to the truth: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39184543,00.htm

Xeno 01/18/05 01:14:32 PM EST

My god! Would someone fire this Fud-monger?!! Not only is this false, she made it up out of thin air. Who pays her check? SCO?!!

John Doe 01/17/05 02:03:39 PM EST

Ppl, what kind pot R U using?
Heroine ?

MG 01/17/05 01:22:15 PM EST

This is a lot to do about nothing (as usual). ODSL is *THE* consortium she is reporting about and they deny this article as being true. This is not some new group that complements or displaces ODSL. What does ODSL do? They promote Linux. They work to make sure that Open Source software is developing properly and moving in the right direction and in the sprit of Open Source. They are also involved in helping to protect customers against litigation. They have big backers from Hitachi, *IBM*, *Intel*, HP, Nec and others. Sound familiar?

It should because it is exact same thing this article reports except with no confirmable sources (only unspecified). I’ve looked (quickly) as far back as 2003, and ODSL has had pretty much the exact same goal as now. That is promoting and protecting the Open Source. The only difference between their mission and what the article reports is what exactly they are supposed to be doing on the 25th. MOG has her theories; based on “trusted sources” and the ODSL evidently thinks otherwise. I suspect that Ms. O’Gara thinks that ODSL knows less about what they do than she does.

We will see what this is about on or around the 25th if there is anything to this story. But the story is probably not all false in a very broad sense; just misleading because it implies the groups (sole?) purpose is to remove IP violations; when for years they openly planned on doing this as part of their mission. It is widely known that a lot of software falls in the same IP dilemma, proprietary or Open Source. In fact proprietary software could be worse because you never see the code; therefore you cannot confirm or deny IP infringement exists. Open Source doesn’t, and can’t have anything to hide. So of course they are the easiest target and logically, should be reviewed to do what can be done to prevent this from ever being a problem.

oprogue 01/17/05 12:47:22 PM EST

I'm a touch confused, Linus just blasted the way security breeches are handled - seems to me these patent nfringements boarder along the same lines. Fix the kernal, issue a new release, give developers time to incorporate it, then and only then comment on potential patent infringements. The greatest battles are won when we didn't even know there was a war.

I am grateful for the contributions being made to ensure the future development of Linux. Maybe we can see the implementation and incorporation of FAST TCP … this alone would allow Linux to fly past the M$ market share in the internet world (percent OS usage by a given populace would probably already place Linux as the dominating OS). M$ is going to have its hands full trying to keep the 7 versions of Longhorn patched, and justifying its charging end-users for antivirus protection for its’ own security holes. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to see M$ attempt to market its’ own flavor of Linux as a means to getting a share of the Linux market (I cringe as such a suggestion … what would they call it, Lindows perhaps … geesh, thank goodness Linspire won that battle). Sun should have publicly crushed M$ over Java patent infringements. Two victories against the monopoly holder. To this ends, we as end-users should pressure the software and hardware markets to cater more to Linux (is that ATI petition still floating around? … how about putting some pressure on D-Link, Texas Instruments, Netgear, Linksys, and others?). A great victory will be had when software and hardware vendors recognize the potential of Linux and the Linux market place.

I am curious, if the Free Software Foundation counsel Daniel Ravicher, the patent attorney, working for us or against us as Linux end-users? Is Linus apart of Operation Open Gates? Many questions remain to be answered.

Linux - for the free generation.
Support Operation Open Gates.
SuSe purchaser and end-user.

oprogue

Mulder 01/17/05 09:02:06 AM EST

> If Microsoft do own any patents which Linux breaches, why haven't Microsoft taken the matter to court?

It wouldn't become MS in its quasi-monopoly position to openly attack a competitor with patent infringement lawsuits.

> It's like the fox coming from the hen house, with chicken feathers all over his lips, saying, "show me the chickens."

If we look at the SCO cases, it's more like the squirrel coming from the woods and the farmer saying "you're a fox and you killed my 5 billion chickens".

Nomen Nescio 01/16/05 06:06:40 PM EST

*chuckles* As usual with O'Gara, you have to look up more reliable sources (such as Groklaw) to find out what the hoopla is all about.

See http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050115131942494
for more (accurate) information.

tech.nix.yoda 01/16/05 09:52:45 AM EST

Linux Developer / Jeff / GrokScam

Since when is making valid and logical obsercations regarding a story and the resulting "support" acharacter attack.

Secondly, the story does not mention the IBM patent release as having any part of this. Unless ubass has info or analysis that says the 500 patatents released were to cover the 253 Microsoft uses to scare folk...

I will let you finish the thought. Please though, use logic when you do.

ubass 01/16/05 09:35:23 AM EST

This raises questions about the value of the IBM patent portfolio recently made available to FOSS. If that portfolio were all that was necessary, then a rewrite would not be required. Great reporting Ms. O'Gara.

Jeff Merkey 01/16/05 04:23:23 AM EST

I provided no input to Ms. O'Gara related to this story. I have more pressing issues than worrying about some brain dead project hosted by OSDL. I'm just surprised OSDL is going at all since it dependent on handouts from IBM and Intel.

Anyway, for those nut cases out there who post and claim I am at the bottom of everything, well, I'm not. I had nothing yo do with this particular story.

Joe7PaK 01/15/05 10:05:51 PM EST

Hey MOG, I hear CBS is looking for a few reporters ... looks to me like you'd fit right in.

Just Me 01/15/05 08:23:21 PM EST

Anticipated OSDL announcement blown out of proportion

http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/01/15/136251

I am not Jeff Merkey 01/15/05 07:42:23 PM EST

But "Linux Developer" is.

Maureen, you should know better than to trust Jeff as an "informed source". What is it between the two of you anyway? Does Jeff's wife know? Assuming she's not a figment of his imagination, too.

T Goddard 01/15/05 05:02:16 PM EST

I have a simple perspective on this. Microsoft hates Linux. The GNU/Linux OS is open source and therefore patent infringements can be easily found and proven.

If Microsoft do own any patents which Linux breaches, why haven't Microsoft taken the matter to court?

I believe that even Microsoft don't think they could make a case based on these alleged patents stand up in court so these patents are more use to them untested as a way to spread FUD.

Bill Fuller 01/15/05 02:43:52 PM EST

Doesn't this woman ever bother to check the facts before she writes her crap - or would that take valuable time away from her constant spreading of FUD? Her stories are so worthless and devoid of facts that to line the bottom of a parakeet's cage with her articles would be an insult to the bird. Might as well just listen to Darl Mc Bride's lunacy - at least you would be getting it straight from the horse's ass, instead of second hand from another one.

GrueMaster 01/15/05 01:47:38 PM EST

Would everyone please quit slamming MOG? She is an excellent writer and this is another example of her exellence as a journalist. I mean, really, she has the best linux columns out there, and she continues to bring truth to the open source world in the same tradition as other great publications, like the "Weekly World News" or the Sun. Other publications and journalists take a Wall Street Journal approach, boring us with facts and information. MOG takes journalism to the cutting edge--and then some!

"Linux Developer" = MOG 01/15/05 01:46:43 PM EST

Thanks Maureen.

Linux Developer 01/15/05 01:41:17 PM EST

Why is it than anytime some makes an observation about Linux that a few people don't like, they attempt to character assassinate anyone who makes the statements? Linus has apparently publically admitted something everyone else has known for years, to put it bluntly, Linux is contaminated with the IP, patents, and trade secrets of others and infringes on other people's IP. I think it is a move in a positiv direction to attempt to clean up Linux. Unfortunately, it may be too little too late.

I mean, who is ever going to trust that Linux doesn't contain stolen intellectual property when the same people who did it in the first place are fixing it. It's like the fox coming from the hen house, with chicken feathers all over his lips, saying, "show me the chickens."

crunchie812 01/15/05 12:23:18 PM EST

For a more accurate perspective, and some insights into O'Gara's value as a reporter and analyst:

http://trends.newsforge.com/trends/05/01/15/136251.shtml?tid=148&tid=17&...
" Two OSDL officials, however, told NewsForge that the report was "inflation of reality" and "not close to accurate at all."

"It's just crazy," said one official, adding that the report's speculation on the patent strategy is "total fabrication as far as we can tell."

tech.nix.yoda 01/15/05 09:39:00 AM EST

re: bystander.

So making logical and critical observations about the article and comments around it are childish, eh?

Mirror?

bystander 01/15/05 04:33:31 AM EST

This is one of the silliest and most childish threads I have had the misfortune to read. May I make a constructive suggestion. The reporter should report whether she approached Linus Torvalds for confirmation, on behalf of OSDL, of this plan. And, if she did, she should report his response, that isn't much to ask. Failing a comment from Linus, or a specification of who she means by the "lights" of Linux, then what does it really matter...the speculation is just that, speculation. Facts are what we need here please. And as for the various idiotic posts on this thread: grow up!

malcontent123 01/15/05 12:15:23 AM EST

It's not enough to just boycott LWN. You must all boycott all SYS-CON advertisers.

The Mad Hatter 01/14/05 06:47:00 PM EST

While I do not think this story is at all accurate, the comments from various PRO/ANTI linux types are off the wall. Keep a lid on it folks.

Oh, and as to the supposed Kernal re-write - what everyone seems to forget is that the Kernal is re-written every two-three years anyway, just as Microsoft's Kernal is, and as Sun's Kernal... All of them are being re-written as we read this article - business as usual in the software trade.

Frank 01/14/05 05:35:57 PM EST

Hold on////

You are right about it being OG FUD, but I would think that she, as an analyst, would first do some research before making such a statement. How does she know the motivations of 1/3 of the patent holders, how did she interview them, when she does not know who they are? Oh wait, I keep forgetting that OG's sole purpose is to confuse and spread FUD.

Hold on 01/14/05 04:40:13 PM EST

/// "...at least another third of the 283 patents are owned by other people with little to lose in threatening enterprise Linux" Where did this come from? I don't recall Ravicher saying such a thing. ///

Where does the article suggest he did? this comment is made by the author. By Maureen O'G not by Ravicher. It's O'gara's point of view, that's quite clear. What you are writing here is just mischievous FUD of your own.

Kimball 01/14/05 04:21:19 PM EST

Rewriting the Linux kernel seems quite a major effort, the merit of which seems to be moot when at the same time being convinced that there is no infringement calling for such effort. I think it is fair to assume that these folks have better things to do then rewrite the kernel just for the sake and fun of it.

Bort 01/14/05 04:02:33 PM EST

an LBW advertiser boycott can be easily implemented with ad-blocking extensions to your web browser.

Matt 01/14/05 03:33:13 PM EST

I agree with the above. Ms. O'Gara should be removed from LBW staff; she is an embarassment. Also note that this phrase contains an actionable libel:

"...the components in the Linux kernel that have been found to tread on other people's IP"

this is stated as a fact -- infringements "have been found" -- not as an allegation or possibility.

Jez 01/14/05 03:27:36 PM EST

It's high time for a concerted boycott of LBW advertisers, until LBW ditches O'Gara.

Frank 01/14/05 02:35:19 PM EST

When will reporters who claim to be analysts begin to analyze? Your wording is interesting and misleading, but perhaps "to mislead" is your purpose. You say, "The Linux kernel is supposed to infringe on..." I remember reading Ravicher's words as MAY infringe. In fact he went out of his way not to put any value on the validity of any of the alledged patents and to say there were only possible infringements as none have ever been claimed against Linux or ruled upon in a court. "...at least another third of the 283 patents are owned by other people with little to lose in threatening enterprise Linux" Where did this come from? I don't recall Ravicher saying such a thing. In fact for him or anyone to do so they would first need to investigate all the patent holders, who "MAY" have been infringed on, to determine their motives.

darlmclied 01/14/05 02:33:18 PM EST

Why didn't you get Compuware's attorney to comment? You know, the guy who, along with Darl, misled[*] you about IBM's disovery "malfeasance" in Compuware vs IBM?

You know, the guy who was giving interviews about how Linux users might be liable to SCO without disclosing that he had a conflict of interest, representing Compuware against IBM.

[*] This is giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you were not co-operating with Darl and Compuware, trying to mislead the public.

tech.nix.yoda 01/14/05 02:32:36 PM EST

You're kidding.

First of all, since when has it ever been show to violate any patents.

Secondly, since was a CRIME to remove the ability to scare folkd to make money.

To all you PHB honks out there, think about that statement.

They want to take away MS's ability to SCARE YOU!

Ms. O'Gara, since when is it a company's right to scare the public into cash flow?

Oh thats right, when it is a monolopy.

This is sick.

W. Anderson 01/14/05 02:24:47 PM EST

Once again, Ms. O'Gara has overstepped truthfulness by stating in her article that Linux kernel "infringes" 200+ patents including a number from Microsoft.

This is a totally false quote from published reference speech and article. The "correct" statements, which were repeated again by author to quash comments like those above, were of "possible" patent infringements - to be determined only by court decision. Futhermore, most if not all more popular proprietary software were in exactly same poistion as singled out Linux kernel.

Tim Hanson 01/14/05 02:05:11 PM EST

I understood this portion was to be called:

"Barbarians at the Open ..."

Oh, never mind.

Wow 01/14/05 11:22:24 AM EST

/// The aim? To rob Microsoft of the ability to scare customers off of Linux by saying that the operating system is a patent infringer///

This is HUGE, HUGE NEWS. If it is corroborated - maybe by Linus himself, since he's at OSDL and so must be part of this if it's real - then it marks the biggest single leap forward that Linux has made since its inception. Bill Gates of course will be livid!!

@ThingsExpo Stories
Software AG helps organizations transform into Digital Enterprises, so they can differentiate from competitors and better engage customers, partners and employees. Using the Software AG Suite, companies can close the gap between business and IT to create digital systems of differentiation that drive front-line agility. We offer four on-ramps to the Digital Enterprise: alignment through collaborative process analysis; transformation through portfolio management; agility through process automation and integration; and visibility through intelligent business operations and big data.
There will be 50 billion Internet connected devices by 2020. Today, every manufacturer has a propriety protocol and an app. How do we securely integrate these "things" into our lives and businesses in a way that we can easily control and manage? Even better, how do we integrate these "things" so that they control and manage each other so our lives become more convenient or our businesses become more profitable and/or safe? We have heard that the best interface is no interface. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Co-Founder & CTO at Octoblu, Inc., will discuss how these devices generate enough data to learn our behaviors and simplify/improve our lives. What if we could connect everything to everything? I'm not only talking about connecting things to things but also systems, cloud services, and people. Add in a little machine learning and artificial intelligence and now we have something interesting...
Last week, while in San Francisco, I used the Uber app and service four times. All four experiences were great, although one of the drivers stopped for 30 seconds and then left as I was walking up to the car. He must have realized I was a blogger. None the less, the next car was just a minute away and I suffered no pain. In this article, my colleague, Ved Sen, Global Head, Advisory Services Social, Mobile and Sensors at Cognizant shares his experiences and insights.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) irreversibly encoded. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Peter Dunkley, Technical Director at Acision, will look at how this identity problem can be solved and discuss ways to use existing web identities for real-time communication.
Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. It also ensured scalability and better service for customers, including MUY! Companies, one of the country's largest franchise restaurant companies with 232 Pizza Hut locations. This is one example of WebRTC adoption today, but the potential is limitless when powered by IoT. Attendees will learn real-world benefits of WebRTC and explore future possibilities, as WebRTC and IoT intersect to improve customer service.
From telemedicine to smart cars, digital homes and industrial monitoring, the explosive growth of IoT has created exciting new business opportunities for real time calls and messaging. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Ivelin Ivanov, CEO and Co-Founder of Telestax, will share some of the new revenue sources that IoT created for Restcomm – the open source telephony platform from Telestax. Ivelin Ivanov is a technology entrepreneur who founded Mobicents, an Open Source VoIP Platform, to help create, deploy, and manage applications integrating voice, video and data. He is the co-founder of TeleStax, an Open Source Cloud Communications company that helps the shift from legacy IN/SS7 telco networks to IP-based cloud comms. An early investor in multiple start-ups, he still finds time to code for his companies and contribute to open source projects.
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to create new business models as significant as those that were inspired by the Internet and the smartphone 20 and 10 years ago. What business, social and practical implications will this phenomenon bring? That's the subject of "Monetizing the Internet of Things: Perspectives from the Front Lines," an e-book released today and available free of charge from Aria Systems, the leading innovator in recurring revenue management.
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges.
There’s Big Data, then there’s really Big Data from the Internet of Things. IoT is evolving to include many data possibilities like new types of event, log and network data. The volumes are enormous, generating tens of billions of logs per day, which raise data challenges. Early IoT deployments are relying heavily on both the cloud and managed service providers to navigate these challenges. In her session at 6th Big Data Expo®, Hannah Smalltree, Director at Treasure Data, to discuss how IoT, Big Data and deployments are processing massive data volumes from wearables, utilities and other machines.
All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices – computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors – connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo in Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be!
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Erik Lagerway, Co-founder of Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services to the modern P2P RTC era of OTT cloud assisted services.
While great strides have been made relative to the video aspects of remote collaboration, audio technology has basically stagnated. Typically all audio is mixed to a single monaural stream and emanates from a single point, such as a speakerphone or a speaker associated with a video monitor. This leads to confusion and lack of understanding among participants especially regarding who is actually speaking. Spatial teleconferencing introduces the concept of acoustic spatial separation between conference participants in three dimensional space. This has been shown to significantly improve comprehension and conference efficiency.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, will discuss single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example to explain some of these concepts including when to use different storage models.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Gridstore™, the leader in software-defined storage (SDS) purpose-built for Windows Servers and Hyper-V, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 15th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Gridstore™ is the leader in software-defined storage purpose built for virtualization that is designed to accelerate applications in virtualized environments. Using its patented Server-Side Virtual Controller™ Technology (SVCT) to eliminate the I/O blender effect and accelerate applications Gridstore delivers vmOptimized™ Storage that self-optimizes to each application or VM across both virtual and physical environments. Leveraging a grid architecture, Gridstore delivers the first end-to-end storage QoS to ensure the most important App or VM performance is never compromised. The storage grid, that uses Gridstore’s performance optimized nodes or capacity optimized nodes, starts with as few a...
The Transparent Cloud-computing Consortium (abbreviation: T-Cloud Consortium) will conduct research activities into changes in the computing model as a result of collaboration between "device" and "cloud" and the creation of new value and markets through organic data processing High speed and high quality networks, and dramatic improvements in computer processing capabilities, have greatly changed the nature of applications and made the storing and processing of data on the network commonplace. These technological reforms have not only changed computers and smartphones, but are also changing the data processing model for all information devices. In particular, in the area known as M2M (Machine-To-Machine), there are great expectations that information with a new type of value can be produced using a variety of devices and sensors saving/sharing data via the network and through large-scale cloud-type data processing. This consortium believes that attaching a huge number of devic...
Innodisk is a service-driven provider of industrial embedded flash and DRAM storage products and technologies, with a focus on the enterprise, industrial, aerospace, and defense industries. Innodisk is dedicated to serving their customers and business partners. Quality is vitally important when it comes to industrial embedded flash and DRAM storage products. That’s why Innodisk manufactures all of their products in their own purpose-built memory production facility. In fact, they designed and built their production center to maximize manufacturing efficiency and guarantee the highest quality of our products.
Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. Download Slide Deck: ▸ Here
All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. Over the summer Gartner released its much anticipated annual Hype Cycle report and the big news is that Internet of Things has now replaced Big Data as the most hyped technology. Indeed, we're hearing more and more about this fascinating new technological paradigm. Every other IT news item seems to be about IoT and its implications on the future of digital business.
BSQUARE is a global leader of embedded software solutions. We enable smart connected systems at the device level and beyond that millions use every day and provide actionable data solutions for the growing Internet of Things (IoT) market. We empower our world-class customers with our products, services and solutions to achieve innovation and success. For more information, visit www.bsquare.com.
With the iCloud scandal seemingly in its past, Apple announced new iPhones, updates to iPad and MacBook as well as news on OSX Yosemite. Although consumers will have to wait to get their hands on some of that new stuff, what they can get is the latest release of iOS 8 that Apple made available for most in-market iPhones and iPads. Originally announced at WWDC (Apple’s annual developers conference) in June, iOS 8 seems to spearhead Apple’s newfound focus upon greater integration of their products into everyday tasks, cross-platform mobility and self-monitoring. Before you update your device, here is a look at some of the new features and things you may want to consider from a mobile security perspective.