Welcome!

Open Source Authors: Bob Gourley, Maureen O'Gara, Adrian Bridgwater, John Cowan, Hovhannes Avoyan

Related Topics: Search

Search: Article

Is Yahoo! Too Large a Company to Force into Microsoft's Ways?

That's the question asked this morning by The New York Times

Is Yahoo! too large a company to force into Microsoft's ways? That's the question asked this morning by The New York Times, whose correspondents John Markoff and Matt Richtel report a Silicon Valley executive as declaring that, when it comes to overall technology mindsets, Microsoft and Yahoo! “are completely at odds with one another.”

The executive in question was CEO of SideStep, and had been a Yahoo! executive in charge of shopping, auctions, travel and real estate before leaving the company in 2006.

Another quoted expert is Brady Forrest, who was was part of a small music start-up acquired by Microsoft in 2000. "Yahoo! is just too big to switch over,” Forrest declares.

The New York Times article raises the whole question of Yahoo!'s IT inrastructure (Yahoo! uses principally FreeBSD with Java and PHP). Rasmus Lerdorf, creator of PHP, is even an infrastructure architecture engineer on the Yahoo! payroll.

Markoff and Richtel write:

"Microsoft and Yahoo! have drastically opposite philosophies on open-source software. While Microsoft has used some open-source code, it has generally not contributed technology to the open-source community. In contrast, Yahoo has been an extensive contributor and has built its internal computing platform almost entirely from open source."

More Stories By Jeremy Geelan

Jeremy Geelan is President & COO of Cloud Expo, Inc. and Conference Chair of the worldwide Cloud Expo series. He appears regularly at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences both in North America and overseas. He is executive producer and presenter of Cloud Expo's "Power Panels" on SYS-CON.TV.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.