|
|
YOUR FEEDBACK
Did you read today's front page stories & breaking news?
SYS-CON.TV |
TOP LINKS YOU MUST CLICK ON Enterprise
Making Sense of Virtualization
The tidal wave of innovation has begun
By: Alex Vasilevsky
Feb. 19, 2007 04:15 PM
Digg This!
Page 2 of 2
« previous page
What About Xen? Open Source technologies like Xen have a history of providing improved functionality, better performance, and lower total cost of ownership than proprietary technologies. Since Xen is free it's rapidly making its way into commercial offerings and end-user solutions. And as virtualization solution costs come down, it becomes feasible to deploy virtualization to every server throughout an enterprise IT infrastructure. History shows Open Source offerings, when generally accepted, tend to catch up with their proprietary counterparts quickly. Not since the Linux and Apache Open Source projects has such a large Open Source community and ecosystem formed so quickly. Although the current proprietary offerings have a few years' head start on Xen, the gap is expected to close quickly. The project and ecosystem has reached critical mass and the Xen hypervisor is emerging as the de facto standard. The tidal wave of innovation has begun.
Understanding Native Virtualization Native Virtualization is similar to full virtualization in how it supports a partitioned server running disparate guest operating systems "as is." This includes support for 32- and 64-bit applications and operating systems running concurrently. It also preserves investment in current certified software stacks, eliminating having to change or upgrade operating systems to run on the latest hardware. Although native virtualization is similar to full virtualization, there are major differences that improve efficiency and manageability. Unlike full virtualization, native virtualization doesn't rely on binary translation to emulate non-virtualizable x86 instructions. Instead it uses hardware virtualization assistance on the latest processors from Intel (Intel-VT) and AMD (AMD-V) to permit each guest operating system to run at full processor speed. Native virtualization also doesn't require a complete instance of a host operating system to be installed and maintained. Instead, it uses small standalone virtualization services software running in a service partition to communicate with the hypervisor. Removing a complete host operating system greatly simplifies maintenance and management since there's no host operating system or virtualization software to install and maintain. It's a common misperception that hardware-assisted virtualization minimizes the role and value of virtualization software. It's actually just the opposite. The new processors from Intel and AMD add other capabilities that greatly simplify and improve virtualization software performance. Without virtualization software, such as the Xen hypervisor and other virtualization services and virtualization management capabilities, you have only a standard server that can run one operating system. Native virtualization leverages these hardware-assisted virtualization extensions to support virtualization software in an integrated and seamless fashion improving the efficiency, performance, and security of virtual servers. By providing a new privilege layer for virtual servers, and supporting key virtualization functions in hardware, this technology will simplify virtual server development and maintenance, improve interoperability with legacy operating systems, enhance security and reliability, and reduce the cost and risk of implementation. These extensions to the chip architectures will help commercial vendors deliver products that reduce the cost and risk of implementing server virtualization solutions and increase the reliability, availability, and security of applications running in virtual partitions. Previously, companies chose from three differing proprietary approaches when deciding on virtualization for x86-based processors. One of the approaches is known as "full virtualization." Here the hypervisor provides a fully emulated x86-based virtual server where unmodified operating systems can run. Another implementation is "OS virtualization" in which a host operating system (single kernel image) multiplexes one operating system kernel to look like multiple operating system instances. A third approach is "paravirtualization" (partial virtualization), which uses slightly modified/customized versions of the operating system kernel to replace non-virtualized x86 instructions with virtualization APIs. All three of these proprietary approaches have advantages and disadvantages as they pertain to performance, efficiency, management, and maintainability. Challenges include lack of standards, performance overhead and degradation, and the need to modify operating systems in some cases. There's also complex management and the excessive administration overhead from maintaining virtualization software.
Choosing the Right Path The benefits of standards-based products are well known and well understood. Customers benefit from "vendor choice," which reduces upfront and ongoing capital expenditures. With standards in place, IT managers can also tap a large pool of available professionals with required skill sets (e.g., Linux, J2EE, etc.). This reduces personnel costs and improves productivity. Other benefits include increased agility, flexibility, and interoperability. Industry standard solutions promote common approaches and architectures for business applications, making it easier to integrate new applications and functionality into core business processes and architectures. This interoperability promotes application agility and allows for a rapid response to changing business conditions. It's difficult and rare to find an off-the-shelf product that delivers a total solution or precisely matches the features and requirements a business needs. It's usually necessary to integrate different software products and system management tools from different vendors. And integration is made easier by standard interfaces and protocols. A standards-based infrastructure also leads to a more stable environment because industry standards are typically backed by an ecosystem of vendors who support the standard and evolve it conservatively so as to not cause major disruption. The standardized environment increases the reliability of an infrastructure and reduces the time to repair it because support staff has fewer products to master and start from well known and documented capabilities.
Time To Virtualize Virtualization is being overwhelmingly accepted in the market, and this has caused the number of virtualization vendors to rise. Although it may become a daunting task to weigh the benefits of the list of vendors and options, IT organizations should simply look for solutions that leverage the advances and new technologies to further improve the ROI of virtualization. The rest will fall into place. Page 2 of 2 « previous page ENTERPRISE OPEN SOURCE MAGAZINE LATEST STORIES . . .
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
|
SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS MOST READ THIS WEEK |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||